Engineering Competence

From lubricant physics to bearing behaviour

The SKF Chair at LaMCoS – INSA Lyon: "Lubricated Interfaces for the Future”.

Related Articles

Now more than ever, designers of efficient and long-lasting lubricated mechanisms need to consider constraints such as the continuous reduction of lubricant film thickness in lubricated systems, the emergence of new materials and the never-ending publication of new requirements around environmental issues such as reducing energy losses and conserving natural resources. This highly evolving context leads to an ever-increasing understanding of the mechanisms of both lubricant film formation and friction dissipation and ultimately helps to develop reliable prediction tools.

Lubricants and their thermo-physical properties play a central role in research that tackles new problems related to both the evolving operating conditions of rolling element bearings and the response of the lubricant applied to them. These aspects are being studied at LaMCoS – INSA Lyon in cooperation with SKF.

In the mid-1990s, the SKF European Research Centre (SKF ERC, now Research & Technology Development,  SKF-RTD) and the Laboratoire de Mécanique des Contacts (LMC, now Laboratoire de Mécanique des Contacts et des Structures, LaMCoS) at INSA Lyon began a collaboration on the lubrication of flange/roller-end contacts such as those found in large-size roller bearings. The key objective was to develop a new test bench, Tribogyr, dedicated to types of lubricated contacts that were barely considered in the scientific literature at that time. The unique specifications formulated by SKF included:

  • simulate, on a 1:1 scale, a real contact such as those found in roller bearings with outside diameters of 600 to 1,000 mm,
  • reproduce the particular kinematics that can be found in these contacts, with an entrainment velocity and also with spin and skew components,
  • respect the radii of curvature of the rolling bodies in the contact area, and
  • measure the three forces and the torque acting on each of the two specimens.

When Tribogyr was validated and put into service, limitations quickly appeared when comparing the experimental results with simulations that allowed the scope of investigation to be extended and the lubricant to be artificially changed. Other approaches were gradually introduced in the projects on the study of large-size lubricated contacts with spinning using Tribogyr (see http://evolution.skf.com/the-beast-of-lyon-putting-large-bearing-contacts-to-the-test/). This research, which was mainly motivated by SKF, became part of a more general research framework that was previously established at LaMCoS and named “A quantitative multi-physics, multi-scale and multi-approach to lubrication and lubricants”.

This general framework is first presented here with some illustrations that refer to the flange/roller-end contacts. More specific aspects are detailed afterwards, still in connection with the lubrication of heavily loaded contacts or elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL).

Fig. 1: Chart describing the quantitative multi-physics, multi-scale and multi-approach to lubrication and lubricants developed at LaMCoS-INSA Lyon.

A general description of a quantitative multi-physics, multi-scale and multi-approach to lubrication and lubricants

The chart in fig. 1 summarizes this multi-approach. Tribology and thus lubrication are by nature multidisciplinary fields. This naturally means that it is necessary to consider that several disciplines can interact, but perhaps the most important point is to be able to conduct simultaneously experimental research and numerical modelling and simulation.

The right-hand side of fig. 1 is divided into two contributions for the sake of clarity. The first is tribometry, which implies metrology of the quantities relative to tribology (friction, film thickness, pressure, temperature, etc.), and metrology, meaning accurate calibration, appropriate uncertainties and repeatability. The second contribution should be an essential part of any research in lubrication: it concerns the physical characteristics of the lubricant and, above all, its rheological properties. After all, viscosity and density of the lubricant are two quantities explicitly present in the Reynolds equation, so they are important parameters to consider and characterize in a proper way. For viscosity this seems trivial, but the film thickness at the centre of an elastohydrodynamic (EHD) contact is also directly dependent on the pressure influence on the lubricant’s density. In addition, solving any thermal problem requires the knowledge, and thus the characterization, of the lubricant’s conductivity and specific heat. It should be underlined that these last parameters vary substantially with pressure and temperature, and we have shown that these variations can have a significant influence on friction [1]. After completion of these experimental characterizations, it is necessary to represent the variations of the measured quantities by robust models, established on a physical basis and not on simple mathematical formulas or regressions. The latter can allow interpolation but not extrapolation of values that are beyond the areas covered by the experiment and that may not cover the ranges found in EHL. This is not only important for assessing whether the lubricant properties are suitable over a wide range of conditions, but it is a fundamental and required contribution for conducting quantitative simulations.

The left-hand side of fig. 1 presents the numerical approach. On the far left is molecular dynamic simulation, based on atomistic considerations and allowing two types of results to be obtained at the nanometre scale, which is also the scale of the numerical models. On the one hand, it is possible to obtain “in silico” the physical state and transport properties of a fluid under imposed pressure and temperature conditions. From this point of view, molecular dynamic simulations can provide useful complements to experiments aimed at establishing the physical characteristics of a lubricant. On the other hand, this type of computational approach makes it possible to study the response of highly confined fluid films and their interfaces with solid media at spatial scales where the continuous mechanics approach is no longer valid. This last approach is the foundation of the multi-physics solver, based here on the finite element method (fig. 1). This tool enables prediction of film thickness and friction in EHD contacts for all types of geometry (linear, circular, elliptical, torus/plane) and kinematics (rolling, sliding, spinning, skew). The actual behaviour of the lubricant is taken into account, and the solver considers heat dissipation. In addition to the operating conditions, the input data are the rheological and physical properties of the lubricant through the models mentioned before.

Fig. 2: Validation of numerical simulations by experiments (here, film thickness measurements) in rolling, sliding and spinning lubricated contacts. Left: FEM solution on the left, interferometric picture on the right for a ball-on-disk contact; <i><em>U<sub>0</sub></em> = 2 m/s, W=400 N.</i> Right: FEM solution (top) and interferogram (bottom) for a torus-on-plane contact; <i><em>U<sub>0</sub></em> = 3 m/s, W=400 N.</i>

Before any attempt was made to use the models (or the Tribogyr device), it was essential to proceed to the quantitative validation of the tools developed in our group at LaMCoS. This was achieved by conducting both experiments and numerical simulations on lubricated flange/roller-end contacts such as those found in large-size roller bearings. Fig. 2 illustrates these validation steps for two rolling, sliding and spinning lubricated contacts and for two configurations: on the left, sphere-on-plane contact [2], and on the right, torus-on-plane contact ([3] slender elliptical-like contact). The operating conditions are indicated in the caption where U0 is the entrainment velocity at the contact centre; note that to be able to carry out white-light interferometry, both planes in the experiments were made of glass. The plane material properties have been modified accordingly in the simulations, and the results colorized using the interferometric calibration curves.

The excellent agreement between experiments and the numerical model is directly included in fig. 2 (left) for the ball-on-plane configuration, indicating a maximum deviation of 1 % whatever the location where the film thickness was estimated. The agreement is also very good in the torus-on-plane case where deviations of 1.5 % were observed on the curved contact central line and of 5 % in the minimum film thickness regions.

Some highlights from the works conducted at LaMCoS-INSA Lyon within the research chair entitled “Lubricated Interfaces for the Future” are summarized hereafter. The title chosen for this cooperation with SKF clearly indicates that the central topic is lubrication, whose main objectives are:

  • separation of surfaces to avoid wear and untimely failure of the mechanism by surface damage, and
  • friction (linked to energy losses) control via the shearing of a characterized lubricant.

Surface separation and contact integrity

As mentioned above, the dual experimental-modelling approach enables a trustable prediction of lubricant film thickness as soon as the lubricant rheological characterization is coupled with multi-physics models at the contact scale, involving non-Newtonian and thermal effects. The challenge is now to anticipate film thickness formation in the framework of real applications involving poor lubrication conditions, with a potentially spinning/skewing kinematics, and in some cases with no entrainment velocity of the lubricant into the contact. This is the case for full-complement bearings where the contact between two successive rolling elements involves two surfaces moving in opposite directions. In that case, both squeeze and thermal effects (fig. 3) need to be considered to build a predictive film thickness model for zero entrainment velocity contacts, which is crucially lacking in the EHL literature and would greatly help to design those bearings [4].

Fig. 3: Temperature field in a zero entrainment velocity EHL contact, showing the gradients in film thickness at the origin of the load-bearing capacity.

From the experimental point of view, major advances were made in order to measure in situ pressure and temperature fields inside the contact and to be able to validate the model predictions. A new technique based on the fluorescence emission sensitivity of nanosensors to temperature and pressure variations has been developed. These nanosensors are dispersed in the lubricant, and their emission energy dependence on temperature and pressure is calibrated under static conditions in diamond anvil cells. The potential of these nanosensors was proven by applying the in situ technique to thin lubricant films encountered in EHD contacts [5]. As an illustration, measured pressures under various operating conditions are compared with numerical predictions in fig. 4. The application of this technique may be extended to quantify and compare heat generation in all steel and hybrid contacts, as an example among many others.

Fig. 4: Measured pressures obtained in situ at the centre of a circular contact through the fluorescence response of nanosensors dispersed in lubricant versus calculated pressures (the dashed line is a visual aid and indicates a slope of 1).

Non-ideal surface separation also happens when solid particles are entrapped in lubricated contacts. To anticipate the risks of surface damage, the flow of these particles at the entrance of the lubricated contact has been studied in a multi-approach manner.  µ-PIV (particle image velocimetry) was coupled to numerical predictions and compared to the observation of dents on roller surfaces from twin-disk experiments. The phenomenology of particle entrapment was explored with µ-PIV technique installed on a ball-on-disk tribometer [6]. It enabled the evaluation of velocity profiles in the contact inlet and the tracking of particles within EHD contacts (fig. 5). A numerical modelling of the inlet flow in EHD contacts, including particle tracking, was developed. Finally, tests carried out on a twin-disc machine with a controlled level of particle contamination were conducted to validate previous conclusions. The results showed how particle entrapment was dependent on the lubricant velocity profile, contact geometry and the nature of the contacting surfaces, introducing silicon nitride instead of bearing steel [7].

Fig. 5: µ-PIV allows tracking (circles and arrows) of solid particle pollution at the entrance of an EHL contact. The orange zone represents the elliptical Hertzian area of contact; the red dashed line is the threshold above which the particles (white dots) may be entrapped.

Friction in EHL contacts

Accurate friction prediction of heavily loaded lubricated contacts is still a challenge for tribology in the 21st century. Many physical aspects are intertwined in the frictional response, such that viscous diffusion of the lubricant (Newtonian or non-Newtonian due to shear-thinning effects) is also influenced by thermal effects at high shear and may even be replaced by a plastic-like response (characterized by a limiting shear stress) under high pressure. The joint research chair contributed to this highly important topic in many ways.

Firstly, experimental friction studies of model fluids were led in parallel to physical characterization of the lubricants at various pressure conditions. Brillouin light scattering (BLS) measurements were performed on model lubricants at rest in high-pressure cells under a wide range of pressures and temperatures such as those found in EHD contacts. They highlighted a transition of behaviour associated with the lubricant glass transition [8]. Furthermore, this transition has been correlated with friction measurements performed in a rolling-sliding contact (fig. 6) [9]. In the same figure, the width of the BLS spectra (full width at half maximum, FWHM, in blue) and the lubricant apparent viscosity in the contact (in orange) showed the same transition of behaviour at a mean contact pressure of the order of the lubricant glass transition. To our knowledge, this is the first time such a correlation was supported by experimental results. Finally, the friction plateau has been shown to trigger the limiting shear stress as soon as the maximum pressure in the contact (the Hertzian pressure) reaches the lubricant glass transition pressure [8].

Fig. 6: Relative apparent viscosity from friction tests (left axis) and width of BLS spectra at rest (right axis) versus contact mean pressure <em>P<sub>m</sub></em> normalized by the lubricant transition pressure <em>P<sub>g</sub></em>.

Secondly, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of different lubricant molecules at equilibrium or under pressure and shear [10] allowed various natures of the flow ­– wall slip, shear banding and central localization are consequences of the surface’s roughness and wettability – to be distinguished from friction, linked to the thermodynamic state of a given lubricant under temperature and pressure (fig. 6). This is illustrated in fig. 7, where friction tests and molecular simulations performed on squalane show both the occurrence of a limiting shear stress regime at 313 K and 1.2 GPa, conditions at which the lubricant is no longer considered in the liquid state. The MD simulations also showed that the molecular mobility of each molecule is at the heart of the frictional response, which is a starting point to establish a rheological model based on physical concepts. This behaviour would ideally be implemented into continuous (e.g., multi-physics FEM) models, which would in turn be compared with experimental measurements. This approach should allow users firstly to simulate and predict friction at a continuous scale over a wide range of pressure and shear, and secondly to predict friction in industrial contacts and systems.

Fig. 7: Friction coefficient of squalane (represented above) at 313 K and 1.2 GPa. The left part of the figure represents our experimental measurements, and the right part shows molecular dynamics predictions at higher shear rate.

Summary and conclusion

  1. SKF has developed a collaboration with LaMCoS at INSA Lyon on the topic of the lubrication of large-size spinning contacts starting in the mid-1990s, and then on broader domains covering lubrication in general from the 2000s.
  2. In May 2013, a research chair funded by SKF and entitled “Lubricated Interfaces for the Future” was launched at LaMCoS – INSA Lyon with the support of the INSA Lyon Foundation and Insavalor, a subsidiary of INSA Lyon for R&D, technology transfer and professional training. The chair was established to find a balance between applied research, which primarily concerns SKF, and more fundamental research that allows university-based researchers to develop new concepts or tools and improve their knowledge, which in turn will be shared with the company’s development engineers and researchers.
  3. Examples of projects carried out between 2013 and 2019 in the framework of this research chair are described here, showing a representative panel of the research conducted within this specific framework. They are all part of a quantitative multi-physics, multi-scale and multi-approach to lubrication and lubricants.
  4. The chair, initially launched in May 2013 for a period of six years, was renewed in March 2019 with the same duration.

References

  1. Habchi W., Vergne P., Bair S., Andersson O., Eyheramendy D., Morales-Espejel G.E., “Influence of Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Thermal Properties of a Lubricant on the Behaviour of Circular TEHD Contacts”, Tribology International 2010, vol. 43(10), p. 1842-1850, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2009.10.002
  2. Doki-Thonon T., Fillot N., Morales Espejel G.E., Querry M., Philippon D., Devaux N., Vergne P., “A dual experimental/numerical approach for film thickness analysis in TEHL spinning skewing circular contacts”, Tribology Letters 2013, vol. 50(1), p. 115-126, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11249-013-0122-1
  3. Wheeler J.-D., Molimard J., Devaux N., Philippon D., Fillot N., Vergne P., Morales-Espejel G.E., “A Generalized Differential Colorimetric Interferometry Method: Extension to the Film Thickness Measurement of Any Point Contact Geometry”, Tribology Transactions 2018, vol. 61 (4), p. 648-660, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10402004.2017.1386809
  4. Meziane B., Vergne P., Devaux N., Lafarge L., Morales-Espejel G.E., Fillot N., “Film thickness build-up in zero entrainment velocity wide point contacts”, Tribology International 2020, vol. 141, p. 105897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.105897
  5. Albahrani S.M.B., Seoudi T., Philippon D., Lafarge L., Reiss P., Hajjaji H., Guillot G., Querry M., Bluet J.M., Vergne P., “ Quantum dots to probe temperature and pressure in highly confined liquids”, RSC Advances 2018, 8, 22897-22908. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA03652G
  6. Strubel V., Simoens S., Vergne P., Fillot N., El Hajem M., Devaux N., Mondelin A ., Maheo Y., “Fluorescence Tracking and µ-PIV of Individual Particles and Lubricant Flow in and Around Lubricated Point Contacts”, Tribology Letters 2017, vol. 65 (75), p. 1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0859-z
  7. Strubel V., Fillot N., Ville F., Cavoret J., Vergne P., Mondelin A., Maheo Y., “Particle Entrapment in Rolling Element Bearings: The Effect of Ellipticity, Nature of Materials, and Sliding”, Tribology Transactions 2017, vol. 60(2), p.373-382, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2016.1168901
  8. S. Ndiaye, L. Martinie, D. Philippon, J. Margueritat, P. Vergne, “On the influence of phase change in highly loaded frictional contacts” (to be submitted to Tribology Letters).
  9. Ndiaye S.-N., Martinie L., Philippon D., Devaux N, Vergne P.: “A Quantitative Friction-Based Approach of the Limiting Shear Stress Pressure and Temperature Dependence”, Tribology Letters 2017, vol. 65(4), paper 149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0929-2
  10. Porras-Vazquez A., Martinie L., Vergne P., Fillot N., “Independence between friction and velocity distribution in fluids subjected to severe shearing and confinement”, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2018, vol. 20, p. 27280-27293, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CP04620D

Keep me updated

Want to learn more about what is driving change in the engineering world? EVOLUTION helps you to stay up to date with emerging trends as well as the latest technology. Sign up for EVOLUTION updates to receive new content directly to your inbox.

Sign up